🎯 Optimization-Based Strategy

Select your primary objective to see the recommended satellite configuration

💸Cost Efficiency Strategy

5A, 0B, 0C

Goal: Minimize total mission cost and maximize satellites per dollar

Deploy maximum satellites within budget constraints

$45M

Total Cost

6.9mo

Timeline

Satellites

Advantages

Lowest cost per satellite ($5M)
Maximum satellite count within budget
Substantial contingency reserves ($5M)
Low resource utilization (41.7%)

Tradeoffs

Longer development timeline (6.9 months)
Basic capability satellites
Single launch concentration risk

💰 Total Investment

$45M

Dev: $25M + Launch: $20M

$5M remaining

👥 Resource Usage

Engineers50/120 (41.7%)

Comfortable capacity

⏱️ Timeline

6.9mo

Including 15% delay buffer

71.3% timeline buffer remaining

🛰️ Mission Output

4.8

Expected working satellites

$9.5M per satellite

Budget Allocation

Configuration Details

5 × Type A

$5M each • 6mo dev • 10 eng, 5 dev

$25M

Total cost

📊 Strategy Summary

Primary Focus

This configuration optimizes for cost efficiency, delivering minimize total mission cost and maximize satellites per dollar.

Key Metrics

Satellites:5

Timeline:6.9mo

Budget Usage:90.0%

Launches:1

Risk Assessment

Low

Launch Risk

Low

Dev Risk

Medium

Budget Risk